Giuliani Hid Behind Attorney-Client Privilege That Didn’t Exist When Responding to Tillerson-Zarrab Story

President Donald Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani hid behind attorney-client privilege that didn’t exist when responding to a New York Times inquiry on Thursday about his past discussions with former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson.

It was reported this week that in 2017 Trump pressed Tillerson to help convince the Department of Justice to drop a criminal case against Reza Zarrab, 34 — an Iranian-Turkish gold trader and a client of Giuliani’s. As the Times reported, Giuliani sought Tillerson’s help in orchestrating a potential prisoner swap with Turkey, even though federal prosecutors had accused Zarrab of “playing a central role in an effort by a state-owned Turkish bank to funnel more than $10 billion worth of gold and cash to Iran, in defiance of United States sanctions designed to curb Iran’s nuclear program.”

Earlier in the week, Bloomberg reported that Trump himself attempted to secure Tillerson’s assistance and asked Tillerson to speak with Giuliani about the Zarrab case. Anonymous sources familiar with the interaction said Tillerson didn’t want to get involved because he thought the request to interfere in an ongoing prosecution was illegal (the Times said Tillerson thought the request was “highly inappropriate”).

Whatever the case, Giuliani didn’t want to get into particulars about his discussion with Tillerson, and cited nonexistent attorney-client privilege to avoid doing so. The Giuliani response to the Times in question:

Mr. Giuliani, in the interview on Thursday, disputed the account provided to The New York Times of his discussion with Mr. Tillerson about Mr. Zarrab — and the assertion that Mr. Tillerson replied that such a step was inappropriate. But Mr. Giuliani did not specify what aspects of the account he found inaccurate, saying he could not discuss the meeting because of attorney-client privilege.

“This is a completely malicious story coming from the consistent attack on me to try to destroy my credibility,” Mr. Giuliani said.

Lawyers were quick to point out Giuliani’s reported response was way off.

CNN legal analyst and attorney Ross Garber succinctly explained why a Tillerson-Giuliani meeting about Zarrab wouldn’t be covered by attorney-client privilege.

“A meeting between Tillerson and Giuliani wouldn’t be covered by attorney confidentiality rules, which apply only to to confidential communications between lawyers and clients related to legal advice,” Garber told Law&Crime.

National security lawyer Bradley P. Moss told Law&Crime that Giuliani was “stonewalling.”

“He is just stonewalling, unless he is claiming that he was simultaneously representing Donald Trump at that same time,” Moss said. “This claim of privilege is ridiculous.”

[Images via Angela Weiss/AFP/Getty Images]

Matt Naham is managing editor of Law&Crime. He formerly worked as news editor and weekend editor at Rare.

  1. Mediaite
  2. The Mary Sue
  3. RunwayRiot
  4. Law & Crime
  5. AmboTV