Watch Our Live Network Now

Steele Dossier Wasn’t Basis for Russia Investigation, Senate Committee Says

The Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday released an “unclassified summary of its initial findings” on its investigation into the American intelligence community’s handling of claims that Russian government operatives interfered with the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. The committee is reviewing a so-called “Intelligence Committee Assessment,” or ICA, which was produced by the CIA, the NSA, and the FBI in January 2017. In other words, this is a summary of an investigation into an investigation. It was released by Sen. Richard Burr (R-NC) and Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA).

The summary appears to conclude that the so-called “Steele Dossier” did not influence the ICA. The Steele Dossier, named after former British spy Christopher Steele, alleged that the Russian government had “been cultivating, supporting, and assisting” President Donald Trump “for at least five years” leading up to the election. The dossier also alleged that the Kremlin had offered Trump a series of “sweetener real estate business deals” in its attempts to cultivate him. The dossier concluded that Trump declined the real estate deals but accepted intelligence from the Kremlin on Hillary Clinton.

The Senate Intelligence Committee summary, released Tuesday, did not directly name Christopher Steele, but it is virtually impossible to suggest the summary was referring to someone other than Christopher Steele:

The FBI had a collection of reports a former foreign intelligence officer was hired to compile as opposition research for the U.S. election, referred to as the “dossier,” when the ICA was drafted. However, those reports remained separate from the conclusions of the ICA. All individuals the Committee interviewed verified that the dossier did not in any way inform the analysis in the ICA – including the key findings – because it was unverified information and had not been disseminated as serialized intelligence reporting.

The summary said that the Senate Intelligence Committee would “address the contents of the reports and their handling by the United States Government” separately.

Generally, the summary states that the Senate Intelligence Committee agrees with the findings of the ICA insomuch that Russia attempted to interfere with the U.S. election, support Trump, and denigrate Clinton.

Sen. Burr, the Intelligence Committee chair, said his committee “spent the last 16 months reviewing the sources, tradecraft and analytic work underpinning the Intelligence Community Assessment and sees no reason to dispute the conclusions” of the ICA. He also said his own committee’s work continues and that, hopefully, the senate committee will “provid[e] the American people with clarity around Russia’s activities regarding U.S. elections.”

Sen. Warner, the vice chair, said that the “ICA . . . assessed that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign to target our presidential election and to destabilize our democratic institutions . . . [a]s numerous intelligence and national security officials in the Trump administration have since unanimously re-affirmed, the ICA findings were accurate and on point.  The Russian effort was extensive and sophisticated, and its goals were to undermine public faith in the democratic process, to hurt Secretary Clinton and to help Donald Trump.”

[Image via screen capture from CBS News.]

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

Filed Under:

Follow Law&Crime:

Aaron Keller holds a juris doctor degree from the University of New Hampshire School of Law and a broadcast journalism degree from Syracuse University.  He is the anchor and executive producer of The Daily Debrief on the Law&Crime Network.  The broadcast is a recap of the day's most compelling trials and court proceedings.  DISCLAIMER:  This website is for general informational purposes only.  You should not rely on it for legal advice.  Reading this site or interacting with the author via this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.  This website is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney.  Speak to a competent lawyer in your jurisdiction for legal advice and representation relevant to your situation.