Watch Our Live Network Now

Here’s How The Jury For College Shooter Steven Jones Was Split During Deliberations

The jury announced Tuesday that it was deadlocked, forcing the judge to declare a mistrial.

Steven Jones testifies during his first-degree murder trial in Flagstaff, Ariz. He told jurors he shot and killed another student in self-defense.

The jury for college shooter Steven Jones was split straight down the middle, says one juror who wishes to remain anonymous.

The jury announced this Tuesday that it was hung on all counts.  Therefore, the judge in the case declared a mistrial.  Jones faced first-degree murder, second-degree murder, manslaughter, and negligent homicide charges over the shooting death of Northern Arizona University student Colin Brough.  Jones also faced aggravated assault charges and assault charges over the shootings of three other students, Nick Piring, Nick Prato, and Kyle Zientek.  Jones claims he was sucker-punched and feared for his life after a handful of fraternity members spilled out onto a street near campus in the overnight hours of an October day in 2015 after they had been drinking.

The juror who came forward told a local television station that six members of the jury wanted to convict Jones of all of the assault charges he faced related to the shootings of Piring, Prato, and Zientek.  Those same six jurors wanted to convict Jones of second-degree murder, not first-degree murder.  Apparently, those six jurors did not believe the shooting was premeditated.

The six other jurors believed the shooting was in self-defense and wanted to acquit on all charges.

The one juror who spoke said members of the jury were all respectful to one another.  He said that only one juror initially agreed that the shooting rose to the level of first-degree (premeditated) murder.  The juror apparently changed his or her mind during deliberations.

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

Filed Under:

Follow Law&Crime:

Aaron Keller holds a juris doctor degree from the University of New Hampshire School of Law and a broadcast journalism degree from Syracuse University.  He is the anchor and executive producer of The Daily Debrief on the Law&Crime Network.  The broadcast is a recap of the day's most compelling trials and court proceedings.  DISCLAIMER:  This website is for general informational purposes only.  You should not rely on it for legal advice.  Reading this site or interacting with the author via this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.  This website is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney.  Speak to a competent lawyer in your jurisdiction for legal advice and representation relevant to your situation.